On Jun 13, 5:23 am, Mick Murphy <MickMur...@discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote:
> SpywareBlaster 4.1 is a non-intrusive, FREE Anti-Spyware Program that runs
> in the background (no scanning by you!).
> Update it once a fortnight, and let it do its work in the background!
It does not work (Restricted Sites entries by) Seeing is believing,
play this:
Restricted Sites Does Not Work
Restricted Sites Does Not Work (9.63M/wmv)...... Audio / Visual
BCPCNet-Modcast movie shows a website that was in Restricted Sites and
I am at that website navigating it with the icon in bottom bar showing
it is in Restricted Sites in the Internet Browser settings (Tools >
Internet Options > Security > Restricted Sites > Sites ...or from
Control Panel). I have mentioned before that the various mass utilites
entries made for this simply are nothing more than a False Sense of
Security. I have said that because I have seen this - and now proof
here as I was able this time to capture it on e-film. As well, it is
possible these type utilties can cause "incremental damage" to the
Windows Registry thus in the worst case scenario causing, yes, the
Windows Operating System to fail and / or other softwares such as an
antivirus program for example. Go To our "Windows Registry
Information" webpage here Windows Registry Information for full
details explaing this. For XP Users the maximum size of the Windows
Registry is 200M (Microsoft increased) and for earlier systems only a
very modest 12M. You type a large email and it can get to 200K to 300K
easily. This is not hard to understand that adding thousands or a
million one liner domains (Example.com) or individual URLs (http : //
something - is URL) to achieve "safe browsing - no malware will
install because site is blocked in Restricted Sites" at some point of
continual "updates" (adding more sites and domains) is going to exceed
the Microsoft: Windows Registry Limits Imposed . This is the major
reason I stopped using them years ago along with the fact that I
discovered they do not work many times - it has been circumvented and
cannot therefore be relied upon as safe except for 'feel good' surfing
(false sense of security). 9.63M / .wmv
If you give bad security advice then that is who you are. No need to
get uncivil about it but rather an education. Would you like to be
educated ? I can help.
webmaster
www.bluecollarpc.net
On Jun 13, 5:23*am, Mick Murphy <MickMur...@discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote:
> Yes to your question. But, there are other Programs to consider as well!
> I use 1 anti-virus, and 2 anti-spyware to good effect!
>
> Vista’s Firewall works very well.
>
> http://www.avast.com/eng/download-avast-home.html
>
> Avast Anti-Virus is Vista compatible (32bit and 64bit Versions), FREE,
> auto-updating, and a low resources user of your computer.
> And, only have 1(one) Anti-Virus installed / running on your computer at any
> one time..
> Conflicts may occur if you have more than 1(one).
>
> http://www.spybot.info/en/index.html
>
> Spybot Search & Destroy 1.5.2 is a very good, FREE Anti-Spyware Program.
> Download, install, update, and immunize your System with it.
> Then SCAN with it.
> Update it, and scan your System once a fortnight.
>
> http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html
>
> SpywareBlaster 4.1 is a non-intrusive, FREE Anti-Spyware Program that runs
> in the background (no scanning by you!).
> Update it once a fortnight, and let it do its work in the background!
>
> -
> Mick Murphy - Qld - Australia
>
>
>
> "Eric N" wrote:
> > I have an HP. 1 gig hard drive, 160mh
>
> > Is nod 32 recommended- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -